↓ Skip to main content

Cord pilot trial - immediate versus deferred cord clamping for very preterm birth (before 32 weeks gestation): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cord pilot trial - immediate versus deferred cord clamping for very preterm birth (before 32 weeks gestation): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-258
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angela Pushpa-Rajah, Lucy Bradshaw, Jon Dorling, Gill Gyte, Eleanor J Mitchell, Jim Thornton, Lelia Duley

Abstract

Preterm birth is the most important single determinant of adverse outcome in the United Kingdom; one in every 70 babies (1.4%) is born before 32 weeks (very preterm), yet these births account for over half of infant deaths.Deferring cord clamping allows blood flow between baby and placenta to continue for a short time. This often leads to increased neonatal blood volume at birth and may allow longer for transition to the neonatal circulation. Optimal timing for clamping the cord remains uncertain, however. The Cochrane Review suggests that deferring umbilical cord clamping for preterm births may improve outcome, but larger studies reporting substantive outcomes and with long-term follow-up are needed. Studies of the physiology of placental transfusion suggest that flow in the umbilical cord at very preterm birth may continue for several minutes. This pilot trial aims to assess the feasibility of conducting a large randomised trial comparing immediate and deferred cord clamping in the UK.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 1%
Unknown 96 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Researcher 7 7%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 27 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Psychology 5 5%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 32 33%