You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The nasal cavity microbiota of healthy adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microbiome, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2049-2618-2-27 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christine M Bassis, Alice L Tang, Vincent B Young, Melissa A Pynnonen |
| Abstract |
The microbiota of the nares has been widely studied. However, relatively few studies have investigated the microbiota of the nasal cavity posterior to the nares. This distinct environment has the potential to contain a distinct microbiota and play an important role in health. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 7% |
| India | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 93% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 237 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 15% |
| Researcher | 36 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 37 | 15% |
| Unknown | 56 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 55 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 32 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 23 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 28 | 11% |
| Unknown | 68 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2023.
All research outputs
#593,180
of 24,885,505 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#164
of 1,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,538
of 236,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,885,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,705 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.