You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Building resilience for future adversity: a systematic review of interventions in non-clinical samples of adults
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12888-014-0227-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tania Macedo, Livia Wilheim, Raquel Gonçalves, Evandro Silva Freire Coutinho, Liliane Vilete, Ivan Figueira, Paula Ventura |
Abstract |
Potentially traumatic events happen in people's lives, leading to the risk of the development of posttraumatic stress disorder, depression and even suicide. Resilience is an individual's ability to maintain or regain his/her mental health in the face of significant adversity or risk of death. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of studies evaluating the effectiveness of resilience promotion interventions in adults. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
Spain | 2 | 25% |
Japan | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 474 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Czechia | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 470 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 74 | 16% |
Researcher | 57 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 52 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 42 | 9% |
Other | 40 | 8% |
Other | 80 | 17% |
Unknown | 129 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 122 | 26% |
Social Sciences | 73 | 15% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 12 | 3% |
Other | 52 | 11% |
Unknown | 152 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#710,985
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#181
of 5,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,614
of 244,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#2
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,507 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.