You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Dissemination of a computer-based psychological treatment in a drug and alcohol clinical service: an observational study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1940-0640-9-15 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Frances J Kay-Lambkin, Aaron L Simpson, Jenny Bowman, Steven Childs |
Abstract |
There is emerging evidence for the potential of computer-based psychological treatments (CBPT) as an add-on to usual clinical practice in the management of health problems. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ireland | 1 | 25% |
Australia | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 106 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 19% |
Student > Master | 17 | 16% |
Researcher | 12 | 11% |
Other | 11 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
Other | 27 | 25% |
Unknown | 12 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 32 | 29% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 25% |
Social Sciences | 13 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
Other | 12 | 11% |
Unknown | 16 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2016.
All research outputs
#8,185,927
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
#253
of 487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,302
of 242,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.