↓ Skip to main content

Towards the targeted management of Chediak-Higashi syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Towards the targeted management of Chediak-Higashi syndrome
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13023-014-0132-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria L Lozano, Jose Rivera, Isabel Sánchez-Guiu, Vicente Vicente

Abstract

Chediak-Higashi syndrome (CHS) is a rare, autosomal recessive congenital immunodeficiency caused by mutations in CHS1, a gene encoding a putative lysosomal trafficking protein. In the majority of patients, this disorder is typically characterized by infantile-onset hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), which is lethal unless allogeneic transplantation is performed. A small number of individuals have the attenuated form of the disease and do not benefit from transplant. Improved outcomes of transplantation have been reported when performed before the development of HLH, thus it is important to quickly differentiate patients that present with the childhood form of disease and to prematurely enroll them into a transplantation protocol. In addition, this would also preclude those that exhibit clinical phenotypes of adolescent and adult CHS from this treatment. Patients with an absence of cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) function have a high risk for developing HLH, and could therefore benefit the most from early hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, although normal CTL cytotoxicity or bi-allelic missense mutations do not exclude the occurrence of HLH in childhood, a more conservative approach is justified. This article summarizes recent advances in the clinical characterization of CHS patients, provides updates on promising new testing methods, and focuses on specific therapeutic approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 97 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 22%
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 17 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 18 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2015.
All research outputs
#3,227,020
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#438
of 2,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,440
of 235,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#9
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.