You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Circulation of four Anaplasma phagocytophilum ecotypes in Europe
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Parasites & Vectors, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1756-3305-7-365 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Setareh Jahfari, E Claudia Coipan, Manoj Fonville, Arieke Docters van Leeuwen, Paul Hengeveld, Dieter Heylen, Paul Heyman, Cees van Maanen, Catherine M Butler, Gábor Földvári, Sándor Szekeres, Gilian van Duijvendijk, Wesley Tack, Jolianne M Rijks, Joke van der Giessen, Willem Takken, Sipke E van Wieren, Katsuhisa Takumi, Hein Sprong |
| Abstract |
Anaplasma phagocytophilum is the etiological agent of granulocytic anaplasmosis in humans and animals. Wild animals and ticks play key roles in the enzootic cycles of the pathogen. Potential ecotypes of A. phagocytophilum have been characterized genetically, but their host range, zoonotic potential and transmission dynamics has only incompletely been resolved. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 168 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 16% |
| Unknown | 44 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 30% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 27 | 16% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 58 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2014.
All research outputs
#15,303,896
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#3,373
of 5,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,435
of 230,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#26
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.