You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Acute effects of a commercially-available pre-workout supplement on markers of training: a double-blind study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12970-014-0040-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jordan J Outlaw, Colin D Wilborn, Abbie E Smith-Ryan, Sara E Hayward, Stacie L Urbina, Lem W Taylor, Cliffa A Foster |
| Abstract |
Pre-workout supplements containing numerous ingredients claim to increase performance and strength. Product-specific research is important for identifying efficacy of combined ingredients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of a proprietary pre-workout dietary supplement containing creatine monohydrate, beta-alanine, L-Tarurine, L-Leucine, and caffeine, on anaerobic power, muscular strength, body composition, and mood states. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 22% |
| Australia | 3 | 13% |
| United States | 3 | 13% |
| Spain | 2 | 9% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 52% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 30% |
| Scientists | 4 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 193 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 54 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 9% |
| Researcher | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Unknown | 34 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 63 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Unknown | 41 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 97. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2024.
All research outputs
#407,237
of 24,323,543 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#131
of 922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,205
of 432,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#127
of 850 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,323,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 922 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 850 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.