↓ Skip to main content

Lung transplantation in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
patent
1 patent
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lung transplantation in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review of the literature
Published in
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2466-14-139
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristin D Kistler, Luba Nalysnyk, Philip Rotella, Dirk Esser

Abstract

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a distinct form of interstitial pneumonia with unknown origin and poor prognosis. Current pharmacologic treatments are limited and lung transplantation is a viable option for appropriate patients. The aim of this review was to summarize lung transplantation survival in IPF patients overall, between single (SLT) vs. bilateral lung transplantation (BLT), pre- and post Lung Allocation Score (LAS), and summarize wait-list survival.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 143 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Student > Master 16 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Other 13 9%
Other 35 24%
Unknown 29 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 35 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,984,551
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#95
of 1,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,519
of 209,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#1
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.