You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Calibration of myocardial T2 and T1 against iron concentration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-014-0062-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John-Paul Carpenter, Taigang He, Paul Kirk, Michael Roughton, Lisa J Anderson, Sofia V de Noronha, A John Baksi, Mary N Sheppard, John B Porter, J Malcolm Walker, John C Wood, Gianluca Forni, Gualtiero Catani, Gildo Matta, Suthat Fucharoen, Adam Fleming, Mike House, Greg Black, David N Firmin, Timothy G St. Pierre, Dudley J Pennell |
| Abstract |
The assessment of myocardial iron using T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has been validated and calibrated, and is in clinical use. However, there is very limited data assessing the relaxation parameters T1 and T2 for measurement of human myocardial iron. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 19% |
| Researcher | 16 | 19% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 18 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 34% |
| Engineering | 6 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 4% |
| Energy | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 28 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2014.
All research outputs
#8,681,963
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#717
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,480
of 243,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#14
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.