↓ Skip to main content

Spatial-explicit modeling of social vulnerability to malaria in East Africa

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Health Geographics, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
263 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spatial-explicit modeling of social vulnerability to malaria in East Africa
Published in
International Journal of Health Geographics, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1476-072x-13-29
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan Kienberger, Michael Hagenlocher

Abstract

Despite efforts in eradication and control, malaria remains a global challenge, particularly affecting vulnerable groups. Despite the recession in malaria cases, previously malaria free areas are increasingly confronted with epidemics as a result of changing environmental and socioeconomic conditions. Next to modeling transmission intensities and probabilities, integrated spatial methods targeting the complex interplay of factors that contribute to social vulnerability are required to effectively reduce malaria burden. We propose an integrative method for mapping relative levels of social vulnerability in a spatially explicit manner to support the identification of intervention measures.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Kenya 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 253 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 18%
Student > Master 44 17%
Researcher 42 16%
Student > Bachelor 16 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 46 17%
Unknown 53 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 14%
Environmental Science 32 12%
Social Sciences 24 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 8%
Other 66 25%
Unknown 65 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,204,326
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Health Geographics
#230
of 654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,642
of 243,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Health Geographics
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.