↓ Skip to main content

Co-infection with HPV types from the same species provides natural cross-protection from progression to cervical cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Infectious Agents and Cancer, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Co-infection with HPV types from the same species provides natural cross-protection from progression to cervical cancer
Published in
Infectious Agents and Cancer, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1750-9378-9-26
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rafal S Sobota, Doreen Ramogola-Masire, Scott M Williams, Nicola M Zetola

Abstract

The worldwide administration of bivalent and quadrivalent HPV vaccines has resulted in cross-protection against non-vaccine HPV types. Infection with multiple HPV types may offer similar cross-protection in the natural setting. We hypothesized that infections with two or more HPV types from the same species, and independently, infections with two or more HPV types from different species, associate with protection from high-grade lesions.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Lecturer 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 8 24%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Computer Science 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 9 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2015.
All research outputs
#11,784,185
of 15,449,825 outputs
Outputs from Infectious Agents and Cancer
#247
of 352 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,983
of 201,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infectious Agents and Cancer
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,449,825 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 352 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them