You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
“You need to take care of it like you take care of your soul”: perceptions and behaviours related to mosquito net damage, care, and repair in Senegal
|
---|---|
Published in |
Malaria Journal, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-13-322 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dana K Loll, Sara Berthe, Sylvain L Faye, Issa Wone, Bethany Arnold, Hannah Koenker, Joan Schubert, Youssoufa Lo, Julie Thwing, Ousmane Faye, Rachel Weber |
Abstract |
Net care and repair behaviours are essential for prolonging the durability of long-lasting insecticidal nets. Increased net durability has implications for protection against malaria as well as cost savings from less frequent net distributions. This study investigated behaviours and motivations for net care and repair behaviours in Senegal with the aim of informing social and behaviour change communication (SBCC) programmes, using the Health Belief Model as a framework. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 25% |
Senegal | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Kenya | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 64 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 14 | 21% |
Researcher | 9 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
Other | 11 | 16% |
Unknown | 18 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 18% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
Environmental Science | 5 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 16% |
Unknown | 21 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2016.
All research outputs
#4,673,749
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,251
of 5,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,163
of 230,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#29
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.