↓ Skip to main content

Objective classification of different head and neck positions and their influence on the radiographic pharyngeal diameter in sport horses

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Veterinary Research, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Objective classification of different head and neck positions and their influence on the radiographic pharyngeal diameter in sport horses
Published in
BMC Veterinary Research, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1746-6148-10-118
Pubmed ID
Authors

Li-mei Go, Ann Kristin Barton, Bernhard Ohnesorge

Abstract

Various head and neck positions in sport horses are significant as they can interfere with upper airway flow mechanics during exercise. Until now, research has focused on subjectively described head and neck positions. The objective of this study was to develop an objective, reproducible method for quantifying head and neck positions accurately.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 38 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Master 5 13%
Other 4 10%
Professor 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Sports and Recreations 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 11 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2014.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Veterinary Research
#2,610
of 3,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,265
of 240,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Veterinary Research
#39
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,298 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.