You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Advancing the application of systems thinking in health: exploring dual practice and its management in Kampala, Uganda
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-4505-12-41 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ligia Paina, Sara Bennett, Freddie Ssengooba, David H Peters |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philippines | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 246 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 43 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 16% |
| Researcher | 40 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 37 | 15% |
| Unknown | 62 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 66 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 38 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 13 | 5% |
| Engineering | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 12% |
| Unknown | 70 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2024.
All research outputs
#4,092,387
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#572
of 1,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,290
of 235,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#14
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.