↓ Skip to main content

KeyPathwayMiner 4.0: condition-specific pathway analysis by combining multiple omics studies and networks with Cytoscape

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Systems Biology, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
KeyPathwayMiner 4.0: condition-specific pathway analysis by combining multiple omics studies and networks with Cytoscape
Published in
BMC Systems Biology, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12918-014-0099-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicolas Alcaraz, Josch Pauling, Richa Batra, Eudes Barbosa, Alexander Junge, Anne GL Christensen, Vasco Azevedo, Henrik J Ditzel, Jan Baumbach

Abstract

Over the last decade network enrichment analysis has become popular in computational systems biology to elucidate aberrant network modules. Traditionally, these approaches focus on combining gene expression data with protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks. Nowadays, the so-called omics technologies allow for inclusion of many more data sets, e.g. protein phosphorylation or epigenetic modifications. This creates a need for analysis methods that can combine these various sources of data to obtain a systems-level view on aberrant biological networks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 4 3%
United States 2 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 115 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 20%
Student > Master 19 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 15 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 22%
Computer Science 25 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 23 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2014.
All research outputs
#7,388,356
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from BMC Systems Biology
#309
of 1,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,682
of 235,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Systems Biology
#7
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.