The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The role of carbonic anhydrase VI in bitter taste perception: evidence from the Car6−/− mouse model
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Biomedical Science, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12929-014-0082-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maarit Patrikainen, Peiwen Pan, Natalia Kulesskaya, Vootele Voikar, Seppo Parkkila |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 22% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 14% |
Student > Master | 7 | 14% |
Researcher | 5 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 12% |
Unknown | 11 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 16% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 10% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 6% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 6% |
Other | 11 | 22% |
Unknown | 13 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2014.
All research outputs
#17,345,186
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Science
#741
of 1,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,370
of 249,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Science
#9
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,119 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.