You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Levels of stigma among community mental health staff in Guangzhou, China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12888-014-0231-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jie Li, Juan Li, Graham Thornicroft, Yuanguang Huang |
| Abstract |
Stigma and discrimination are widely experienced by people with mental illness, even in healthcare settings. The purposes of this study were to assess mental health stigma among community mental health staff in Guangzhou, China and in doing so also to assess the psychometric properties of the Reported and Intended Behaviour Scale (RIBS) - Chinese version. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 138 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 25 | 18% |
| Unknown | 29 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 36 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Unknown | 33 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2014.
All research outputs
#4,048,565
of 24,862,067 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#1,523
of 5,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,936
of 236,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#15
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,862,067 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,265 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.