↓ Skip to main content

Preparing for human papillomavirus vaccine introduction in Kenya: implications from focus-group and interview discussions with caregivers and opinion leaders in Western Kenya

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
215 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Preparing for human papillomavirus vaccine introduction in Kenya: implications from focus-group and interview discussions with caregivers and opinion leaders in Western Kenya
Published in
BMC Public Health, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-855
Pubmed ID
Authors

Allison L Friedman, Kelvin O Oruko, Melissa A Habel, Jessie Ford, Jennine Kinsey, Frank Odhiambo, Penelope A Phillips-Howard, Susan A Wang, Tabu Collins, Kayla F Laserson, Eileen F Dunne

Abstract

Cervical cancer claims the lives of 275,000 women each year; most of these deaths occur in low-or middle-income countries. In Kenya, cervical cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women of reproductive age. Kenya's Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation has developed a comprehensive strategy to prevent cervical cancer, which includes plans for vaccinating preteen girls against human papillomavirus (HPV) by 2015. To identify HPV vaccine communication and mobilization needs, this research sought to understand HPV vaccine-related perceptions and concerns of male and female caregivers and community leaders in four rural communities of western Kenya.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 211 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 22%
Researcher 27 13%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 8%
Other 26 12%
Unknown 57 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 13%
Social Sciences 23 11%
Psychology 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 31 14%
Unknown 69 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2019.
All research outputs
#6,272,839
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,578
of 14,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,183
of 209,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#108
of 279 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 279 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.