↓ Skip to main content

The research on endothelial function in women and men at risk for cardiovascular disease (REWARD) study: methodology

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The research on endothelial function in women and men at risk for cardiovascular disease (REWARD) study: methodology
Published in
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, August 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2261-11-50
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon L Bacon, Kim L Lavoie, André Arsenault, Jocelyn Dupuis, Louise Pilote, Catherine Laurin, Jennifer Gordon, Denyse Gautrin, Alain Vadeboncoeur

Abstract

Endothelial function has been shown to be a highly sensitive marker for the overall cardiovascular risk of an individual. Furthermore, there is evidence of important sex differences in endothelial function that may underlie the differential presentation of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in women relative to men. As such, measuring endothelial function may have sex-specific prognostic value for the prediction of CVD events, thus improving risk stratification for the overall prediction of CVD in both men and women. The primary objective of this study is to assess the clinical utility of the forearm hyperaemic reactivity (FHR) test (a proxy measure of endothelial function) for the prediction of CVD events in men vs. women using a novel, noninvasive nuclear medicine -based approach. It is hypothesised that: 1) endothelial dysfunction will be a significant predictor of 5-year CVD events independent of baseline stress test results, clinical, demographic, and psychological variables in both men and women; and 2) endothelial dysfunction will be a better predictor of 5-year CVD events in women compared to men.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Unknown 75 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 17%
Student > Bachelor 13 17%
Researcher 10 13%
Professor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 18 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Psychology 4 5%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 25 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2012.
All research outputs
#15,234,609
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#817
of 1,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,315
of 120,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,586 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.