↓ Skip to main content

Blocking primers to enhance PCR amplification of rare sequences in mixed samples – a case study on prey DNA in Antarctic krill stomachs

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Zoology, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
6 patents
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
362 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
865 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Blocking primers to enhance PCR amplification of rare sequences in mixed samples – a case study on prey DNA in Antarctic krill stomachs
Published in
Frontiers in Zoology, July 2008
DOI 10.1186/1742-9994-5-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hege Vestheim, Simon N Jarman

Abstract

Identification of DNA sequence diversity is a powerful means for assessing the species present in environmental samples. The most common molecular strategies for estimating taxonomic composition depend upon PCR with universal primers that amplify an orthologous DNA region from a range of species. The diversity of sequences within a sample that can be detected by universal primers is often compromised by high concentrations of some DNA templates. If the DNA within the sample contains a small number of sequences in relatively high concentrations, then less concentrated sequences are often not amplified because the PCR favours the dominant DNA types. This is a particular problem in molecular diet studies, where predator DNA is often present in great excess of food-derived DNA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 865 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 13 2%
Germany 7 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Chile 3 <1%
Poland 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Finland 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Other 12 1%
Unknown 816 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 200 23%
Researcher 197 23%
Student > Master 114 13%
Student > Bachelor 71 8%
Other 44 5%
Other 121 14%
Unknown 118 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 432 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 118 14%
Environmental Science 86 10%
Chemistry 13 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 1%
Other 60 7%
Unknown 144 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2022.
All research outputs
#3,622,393
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Zoology
#215
of 695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,317
of 96,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Zoology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them