↓ Skip to main content

The impact of transmural multiprofessional simulation-based obstetric team training on perinatal outcome and quality of care in the Netherlands

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The impact of transmural multiprofessional simulation-based obstetric team training on perinatal outcome and quality of care in the Netherlands
Published in
BMC Medical Education, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-14-175
Pubmed ID
Authors

Franyke R Banga, Sophie E M Truijens, Annemarie F Fransen, Jeanne P Dieleman, Pieter J van Runnard Heimel, Guid S Oei

Abstract

Perinatal mortality and morbidity in the Netherlands is relatively high compared to other European countries. Our country has a unique system with an independent primary care providing care to low-risk pregnancies and a secondary/tertiary care responsible for high-risk pregnancies. About 65% of pregnant women in the Netherlands will be referred from primary to secondary care implicating multiple medical handovers. Dutch audits concluded that in the entire obstetric collaborative network process parameters could be improved. Studies have shown that obstetric team training improves perinatal outcome and that simulation-based obstetric team training implementing crew resource management (CRM) improves team performance. In addition, deliberate practice (DP) improves medical skills. The aim of this study is to analyse whether transmural multiprofessional simulation-based obstetric team training improves perinatal outcome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 96 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 27%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 26 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 11%
Psychology 4 4%
Engineering 4 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 33 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2015.
All research outputs
#12,587,936
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,418
of 3,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,658
of 235,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#26
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,305 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.