↓ Skip to main content

Medical students as sexual health peer educators: who benefits more?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Medical students as sexual health peer educators: who benefits more?
Published in
BMC Medical Education, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-14-162
Pubmed ID
Authors

Florence Bretelle, Raha Shojai, Julie Brunet, Sophie Tardieu, Marie Christine Manca, Joelle Durant, Claire Ricciardi, Leon Boubli, George Leonetti

Abstract

A prospective study was conducted to evaluate the impact of an educational reproductive health program on medical student peer educators and the secondary school pupils whom they taught.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 76 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 19%
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Bachelor 13 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 12 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 12%
Psychology 9 12%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 15 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2014.
All research outputs
#13,859,387
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,729
of 3,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,116
of 232,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#34
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.