You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of a brief anti-stigma campaign in Cambridge: do short-term campaigns work?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-10-339 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sara Evans-Lacko, Jillian London, Kirsty Little, Claire Henderson, Graham Thornicroft |
| Abstract |
In view of the high costs of mass-media campaigns, it is important to understand whether it is possible for a media campaign to have significant population effects over a short period of time. This paper explores this question specifically in reference to stigma and discrimination against people with mental health problems using the Time to Change Cambridge anti-stigma campaign as an example. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 177 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 18% |
| Researcher | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 30 | 17% |
| Unknown | 26 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 55 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 26 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 7% |
| Decision Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 30 | 17% |
| Unknown | 32 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2021.
All research outputs
#6,420,228
of 24,368,983 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,635
of 16,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,922
of 99,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#32
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,368,983 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.