↓ Skip to main content

The risks of malaria infection in Kenya in 2009

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
252 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The risks of malaria infection in Kenya in 2009
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, November 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-9-180
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abdisalan M Noor, Peter W Gething, Victor A Alegana, Anand P Patil, Simon I Hay, Eric Muchiri, Elizabeth Juma, Robert W Snow

Abstract

To design an effective strategy for the control of malaria requires a map of infection and disease risks to select appropriate suites of interventions. Advances in model based geo-statistics and malaria parasite prevalence data assemblies provide unique opportunities to redefine national Plasmodium falciparum risk distributions. Here we present a new map of malaria risk for Kenya in 2009.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Kenya 4 2%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Bangladesh 3 1%
United States 3 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 233 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 50 20%
Student > Master 50 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 16%
Student > Bachelor 18 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 4%
Other 31 12%
Unknown 53 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 12%
Environmental Science 17 7%
Social Sciences 14 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 5%
Other 64 25%
Unknown 64 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2013.
All research outputs
#8,255,482
of 24,723,421 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2,869
of 8,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,048
of 176,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,723,421 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.