↓ Skip to main content

The F unctional A ssessment of C hronic I llness T herapy (FACIT) Measurement System: properties, applications, and interpretation

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, December 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
1212 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
766 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The F unctional A ssessment of C hronic I llness T herapy (FACIT) Measurement System: properties, applications, and interpretation
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, December 2003
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-1-79
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kimberly Webster, David Cella, Kathleen Yost

Abstract

The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Measurement System is a collection of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires targeted to the management of chronic illness. The measurement system, under development since 1987, began with the creation of a generic CORE questionnaire called the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). The FACT-G (now in Version 4) is a 27-item compilation of general questions divided into four primary QOL domains: Physical Well-Being, Social/Family Well-Being, Emotional Well-Being, and Functional Well-Being. It is appropriate for use with patients with any form of cancer, and extensions of it have been used and validated in other chronic illness condition (e.g., HIV/AIDS; multiple sclerosis; Parkinson's disease; rheumatoid arthritis), and in the general population. The FACIT Measurement System now includes over 400 questions, some of which have been translated into more than 45 languages. Assessment of any one patient is tailored so that the most-relevant questions are asked and administration time for any one assessment is usually less than 15 minutes. This is accomplished both by the use of specific subscales for relevant domains of HRQOL, or computerized adaptive testing (CAT) of selected symptoms and functional areas. FACIT questionnaires can be administered by self-report (paper or computer) or interview (face-to-face or telephone). Available scoring, normative data and information on meaningful change now allow one to interpret results in the context of a growing literature base.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 766 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 748 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 102 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 96 13%
Researcher 90 12%
Student > Bachelor 76 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 43 6%
Other 154 20%
Unknown 205 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 208 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 103 13%
Psychology 61 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 22 3%
Other 115 15%
Unknown 233 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,870,073
of 25,962,638 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#102
of 2,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,743
of 143,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,962,638 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.