↓ Skip to main content

Women's health groups to improve perinatal care in rural Nepal

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Women's health groups to improve perinatal care in rural Nepal
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, March 2005
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-5-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joanna Morrison, Suresh Tamang, Natasha Mesko, David Osrin, Bhim Shrestha, Madan Manandhar, Dharma Manandhar, Hilary Standing, Anthony Costello

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neonatal mortality rates are high in rural Nepal where more than 90% of deliveries are in the home. Evidence suggests that death rates can be reduced by interventions at community level. We describe an intervention which aimed to harness the power of community planning and decision making to improve maternal and newborn care in rural Nepal. METHODS: The development of 111 women's groups in a population of 86 704 in Makwanpur district, Nepal is described. The groups, facilitated by local women, were the intervention component of a randomized controlled trial to reduce perinatal and neonatal mortality rates. Through participant observation and analysis of reports, we describe the implementation of this intervention: the community entry process, the facilitation of monthly meetings through a participatory action cycle of problem identification, community planning, and implementation and evaluation of strategies to tackle the identified problems. RESULTS: In response to the needs of the group, participatory health education was added to the intervention and the women's groups developed varied strategies to tackle problems of maternal and newborn care: establishing mother and child health funds, producing clean home delivery kits and operating stretcher schemes. Close linkages with community leaders and community health workers improved strategy implementation. There were also indications of positive effects on group members and health services, and most groups remained active after 30 months. CONCLUSION: A large scale and potentially sustainable participatory intervention with women's groups, which focused on pregnancy, childbirth and the newborn period, resulted in innovative strategies identified by local communities to tackle perinatal care problems.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Uganda 1 <1%
Malawi 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 133 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 25%
Researcher 27 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 11%
Student > Postgraduate 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 17 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 36%
Social Sciences 28 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 3%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 22 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,810,411
of 23,702,491 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#2,147
of 4,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,212
of 60,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,702,491 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,364 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them