↓ Skip to main content

Content-based histopathology image retrieval using CometCloud

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Content-based histopathology image retrieval using CometCloud
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-15-287
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xin Qi, Daihou Wang, Ivan Rodero, Javier Diaz-Montes, Rebekah H Gensure, Fuyong Xing, Hua Zhong, Lauri Goodell, Manish Parashar, David J Foran, Lin Yang

Abstract

The development of digital imaging technology is creating extraordinary levels of accuracy that provide support for improved reliability in different aspects of the image analysis, such as content-based image retrieval, image segmentation, and classification. This has dramatically increased the volume and rate at which data are generated. Together these facts make querying and sharing non-trivial and render centralized solutions unfeasible. Moreover, in many cases this data is often distributed and must be shared across multiple institutions requiring decentralized solutions. In this context, a new generation of data/information driven applications must be developed to take advantage of the national advanced cyber-infrastructure (ACI) which enable investigators to seamlessly and securely interact with information/data which is distributed across geographically disparate resources. This paper presents the development and evaluation of a novel content-based image retrieval (CBIR) framework. The methods were tested extensively using both peripheral blood smears and renal glomeruli specimens. The datasets and performance were evaluated by two pathologists to determine the concordance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Ukraine 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 57 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 20%
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Master 7 11%
Professor 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 15 25%
Unknown 8 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 22 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 16%
Engineering 7 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Mathematics 2 3%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 14 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2022.
All research outputs
#7,607,041
of 24,954,788 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#2,742
of 7,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,583
of 242,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#49
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,954,788 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.