You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Belgian Diabetes in Pregnancy Study (BEDIP-N), a multi-centric prospective cohort study on screening for diabetes in pregnancy and gestational diabetes: methodology and design
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2393-14-226 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katrien Benhalima, Paul Van Crombrugge, Johan Verhaeghe, Sofie Vandeginste, Hilde Verlaenen, Chris Vercammen, Els Dufraimont, Christophe De Block, Yves Jacquemyn, Farah Mekahli, Katrien De Clippel, Roland Devlieger, Chantal Mathieu |
| Abstract |
The International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) recommends universal screening with a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) using stricter criteria for gestational diabetes (GDM). This may lead to important increases in the prevalence of GDM and associated costs, whereas the gain in health is unclear. The goal of 'The Belgian Diabetes in Pregnancy Study' (BEDIP-N) is to evaluate the best screening strategy for pregestational diabetes in early pregnancy and GDM in an ethnically diverse western European population. The IADPSG screening strategy will be followed, but in addition risk questionnaires and a 50 g glucose challenge test (GCT) will be performed, in order to define the most practical and most cost effective screening strategy in this population. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 147 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 14% |
| Researcher | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 16% |
| Unknown | 49 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Unknown | 54 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2014.
All research outputs
#17,145,263
of 25,187,238 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#3,333
of 4,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,367
of 232,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#87
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,187,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.