↓ Skip to main content

There’s life in the old dog yet: vitamin C as a therapeutic option in endothelial dysfunction

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
There’s life in the old dog yet: vitamin C as a therapeutic option in endothelial dysfunction
Published in
Critical Care, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13054-014-0461-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra Rodemeister, Hans K Biesalski

Abstract

The use of vitamin C against different diseases has been controversially and emotionally discussed since Linus Pauling published his cancer studies. In vitro and animal studies showed promising results and explained the impact of vitamin C, particularly in cases with endothelial dysfunction. Indeed, studies (reviewed in this issue of Critical Care by Oudemans-van Straaten and colleagues) using high-dose vitamin C and the parenteral route of application seem to be more successful than oral vitamin C delivery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Romania 1 2%
Unknown 42 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 16%
Student > Master 7 16%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 5%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 11 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 51%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Chemistry 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2022.
All research outputs
#3,550,384
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,758
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,311
of 247,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#27
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.