You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Advancing the application of systems thinking in health: advice seeking behavior among primary health care physicians in Pakistan
|
---|---|
Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1478-4505-12-43 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Asmat U Malik, Cameron D Willis, Saima Hamid, Anar Ulikpan, Peter S Hill |
Abstract |
Using measles and tuberculosis as case examples, with a systems thinking approach, this study examines the human advice-seeking behavior of primary health care (PHC) physicians in a rural district of Pakistan. This study analyzes the degree to which the existing PHC system supports their access to human advice, and explores in what ways this system might be strengthened to better meet provider needs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pakistan | 4 | 40% |
United States | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 90% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
Malta | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 133 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 24 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 15% |
Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
Other | 25 | 18% |
Unknown | 29 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 23% |
Social Sciences | 25 | 18% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
Computer Science | 5 | 4% |
Other | 18 | 13% |
Unknown | 37 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2014.
All research outputs
#4,672,390
of 25,311,095 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#643
of 1,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,878
of 243,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#14
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,311,095 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.