↓ Skip to main content

A quantitative analysis of gait patterns in vestibular neuritis patients using gyroscope sensor and a continuous walking protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A quantitative analysis of gait patterns in vestibular neuritis patients using gyroscope sensor and a continuous walking protocol
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1743-0003-11-58
Pubmed ID
Authors

Soo Chan Kim, Joo Yeon Kim, Hwan Nyeong Lee, Hwan Ho Lee, Jae Hwan Kwon, Nam beom Kim, Mi Joo Kim, Jong Hyun Hwang, Gyu Cheol Han

Abstract

Locomotion involves an integration of vision, proprioception, and vestibular information. The parieto-insular vestibular cortex is known to affect the supra-spinal rhythm generators, and the vestibular system regulates anti-gravity muscle tone of the lower leg in the same side to maintain an upright posture through the extra-pyramidal track. To demonstrate the relationship between locomotion and vestibular function, we evaluated the differences in gait patterns between vestibular neuritis (VN) patients and normal subjects using a gyroscope sensor and long-way walking protocol.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Unknown 72 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 26%
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Researcher 7 9%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 26%
Engineering 12 15%
Neuroscience 9 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Sports and Recreations 4 5%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 18 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2016.
All research outputs
#14,784,335
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#778
of 1,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,245
of 226,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#19
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.