↓ Skip to main content

Quick biochemical markers for assessment of quality control of intraoperative cell salvage: a prospective observational study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quick biochemical markers for assessment of quality control of intraoperative cell salvage: a prospective observational study
Published in
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1749-8090-9-86
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peng Dong, Ji Che, Xiuliang Li, Ming Tian, Fang Gao Smith

Abstract

Intraoperative Cell Salvage (ICS), hereby referred to 'mechanical red cell salvage', has been widely used in adult elective major surgeries to reduce requirement for homologous red blood cell transfusion and its associated complications. However, amount of free haemoglobin (fHb) from ICS has been shown related to incidence of renal failure. fHb is the most important indicator of quality control of cell salvaged blood, thus monitoring the fHb concentration is imperative to minimise renal injury. However, currently there has been lacking quick biochemical markers to monitor the levels of fHb during ICS. The aim of this study was to screen quick biochemical markers for evaluating the amount of fHb during use of intraoperative cell salvage.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 18%
Student > Bachelor 5 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 14%
Engineering 3 11%
Unspecified 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 10 36%