↓ Skip to main content

Psychological distress in the workforce: a multilevel and longitudinal analysis of the case of regulated occupations in Canada

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychological distress in the workforce: a multilevel and longitudinal analysis of the case of regulated occupations in Canada
Published in
BMC Public Health, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-808
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nathalie Cadieux, Alain Marchand

Abstract

This study uses a multidimensional theoretical model to evaluate the role of regulated occupations and working conditions in explaining psychological distress.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 76 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 17%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 27 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 14%
Psychology 10 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 12%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 6%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 29 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2014.
All research outputs
#13,178,901
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,259
of 14,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,951
of 230,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#163
of 277 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 277 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.