↓ Skip to main content

FISH molecular testing in cytological preparations from solid tumors

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Cytogenetics, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 400)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
301 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
FISH molecular testing in cytological preparations from solid tumors
Published in
Molecular Cytogenetics, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13039-014-0056-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paola Caria, Roberta Vanni

Abstract

Many of the exciting new developments in solid tumor molecular cytogenetics impact classical and molecular pathology. Fluorescence in situ hybridization to identify specific DNA target sequences in nuclei of non-dividing cells in solid neoplasms has contributed to the integration of molecular cytogenetics into cytology in spite of the remarkable promiscuity of cancer genes. Indeed, although it is a low-throughput assay, fluorescence in situ hybridization enables the direct disclosure and localization of genetic markers in single nuclei. Gene fusions are among the most prominent genetic alterations in cancer, providing markers that may be determinant in needle biopsies that are negative or suspicious for malignancy, and may contribute to the correct classification of the tumors. In view of the expanding use of fluorescence in situ hybridization in cytology, future challenges include automated sample evaluation and the specification of common criteria for interpreting and reporting results.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 301 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 301 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 2%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 <1%
Researcher 3 <1%
Student > Master 2 <1%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 283 94%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 <1%
Chemistry 1 <1%
Engineering 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 283 94%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2014.
All research outputs
#6,223,501
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Cytogenetics
#36
of 400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,252
of 235,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Cytogenetics
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 400 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them