You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Erratum to: Ockham’s razor for the MET-driven invasive growth linking idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12967-017-1295-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giulia M. Stella, Alessandra Gentile, Alice Balderacchi, Federica Meloni, Melissa Milan, Silvia Benvenuti |
| Abstract |
In the original version of this article [1], published on 2 September 2016, the name of author 'Alice Balderacchi' was wrongly displayed. In this Erratum the incorrect name and correct name are shown. The original publication of this article has been corrected. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 33% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 33% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2017.
All research outputs
#15,479,632
of 23,002,898 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#2,257
of 4,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,629
of 318,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#29
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,002,898 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,021 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.