↓ Skip to main content

Polysialic acid is associated with better prognosis and IDH1-mutation in diffusely infiltrating astrocytomas

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Polysialic acid is associated with better prognosis and IDH1-mutation in diffusely infiltrating astrocytomas
Published in
BMC Cancer, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-14-623
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katri Mäkelä, Kristiina Nordfors, Jukka Finne, Anne Jokilammi, Timo Paavonen, Hannu Haapasalo, Miikka Korja, Joonas Haapasalo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 27%
Student > Master 3 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Professor 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2016.
All research outputs
#14,199,380
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#3,353
of 8,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,469
of 236,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#62
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,277 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.