↓ Skip to main content

BATVI: Fast, sensitive and accurate detection of virus integrations

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
BATVI: Fast, sensitive and accurate detection of virus integrations
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, March 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12859-017-1470-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chandana Tennakoon, Wing Kin Sung

Abstract

The study of virus integrations in human genome is important since virus integrations were shown to be associated with diseases. In the literature, few methods have been proposed that predict virus integrations using next generation sequencing datasets. Although they work, they are slow and are not very sensitive. This paper introduces a new method BatVI to predict viral integrations. Our method uses a fast screening method to filter out chimeric reads containing possible viral integrations. Next, sensitive alignments of these candidate chimeric reads are called by BLAST. Chimeric reads that are co-localized in the human genome are clustered. Finally, by assembling the chimeric reads in each cluster, high confident virus integration sites are extracted. We compared the performance of BatVI with existing methods VirusFinder and VirusSeq using both simulated and real-life datasets of liver cancer patients. BatVI ran an order of magnitude faster and was able to predict almost twice the number of true positives compared to other methods while maintaining a false positive rate less than 1%. For the liver cancer datasets, BatVI uncovered novel integrations to two important genes TERT and MLL4, which were missed by previous studies. Through gene expression data, we verified the correctness of these additional integrations. BatVI can be downloaded from http://biogpu.ddns.comp.nus.edu.sg/~ksung/batvi/index.html .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 4%
Unknown 27 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 39%
Student > Master 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 25%
Computer Science 4 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 7%
Chemistry 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2022.
All research outputs
#6,656,160
of 23,523,017 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#2,525
of 7,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,170
of 309,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#40
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,523,017 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.