↓ Skip to main content

Beliefs and perceptions about the causes of breast cancer: a case-control study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Beliefs and perceptions about the causes of breast cancer: a case-control study
Published in
BMC Research Notes, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-7-558
Pubmed ID
Authors

Allyson K Thomson, Jane S Heyworth, Jennifer Girschik, Terry Slevin, Christobel Saunders, Lin Fritschi

Abstract

Attributions of causality are common for many diseases, including breast cancer. The risk of developing breast cancer can be reduced by modifications to lifestyle and behaviours to minimise exposure to specific risk factors, such as obesity. However, these modifications will only occur if women believe that certain behaviours/lifestyle factors have an impact on the development of breast cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Namibia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 153 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 35 22%
Student > Master 24 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Researcher 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 41 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 12%
Psychology 16 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 45 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,081,461
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#111
of 4,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,865
of 235,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#4
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.