You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development of a Management Algorithm for Post-operative Pain (MAPP) after total knee and total hip replacement: study rationale and design
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-014-0110-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mari Botti, Bridie Kent, Tracey Bucknall, Maxine Duke, Megan-Jane Johnstone, Julie Considine, Bernice Redley, Susan Hunter, Richard de Steiger, Marlene Holcombe, Emma Cohen |
| Abstract |
Evidence from clinical practice and the extant literature suggests that post-operative pain assessment and treatment is often suboptimal. Poor pain management is likely to persist until pain management practices become consistent with guidelines developed from the best available scientific evidence. This work will address the priority in healthcare of improving the quality of pain management by standardising evidence-based care processes through the incorporation of an algorithm derived from best evidence into clinical practice. In this paper, the methodology for the creation and implementation of such an algorithm that will focus, in the first instance, on patients who have undergone total hip or knee replacement is described. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 103 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 20% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 25 | 23% |
| Unknown | 20 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 17% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 22 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2014.
All research outputs
#8,127,478
of 25,286,324 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,252
of 1,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,426
of 243,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#35
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,286,324 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,795 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.