↓ Skip to main content

AVATS: Awake Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery –extended series report

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
AVATS: Awake Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery –extended series report
Published in
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13019-014-0149-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ara S Klijian, Michael Gibbs, Nicole T Andonian

Abstract

BackgroundTraditionally, video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is performed under general anesthesia with selective ventilation and endotracheal intubation. Although some sparse data exists on VATS under local anesthesia, most series reserve this technique for pleural-based surgery. Performing VATS under local anesthesia may extend the benefits of this procedure to those unable to tolerate general anesthesia and improve outcomes.MethodWe have extended this technique to include more complex procedures, with results that surpass traditional open thoracotomies. We analyzed 293 patients who underwent awake video-assisted thoracic surgery (AVATS) from June 2010 to January 2014.ResultsProcedures such as pleural biopsies, wedge resections, decortications, and even lobectomies were able to be safely performed using AVATS technique with comparable or better results than VATS under general anesthesia.ConclusionAVATS is a feasible technique with equal or improved outcomes without compromise in safety. Further study may help delineate the role of this technique in the care of the thoracic surgical patient.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 29%
Student > Master 4 19%
Other 3 14%
Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 71%
Computer Science 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Unknown 4 19%