↓ Skip to main content

AliGROOVE – visualization of heterogeneous sequence divergence within multiple sequence alignments and detection of inflated branch support

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
AliGROOVE – visualization of heterogeneous sequence divergence within multiple sequence alignments and detection of inflated branch support
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-15-294
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick Kück, Sandra A Meid, Christian Groß, Johann W Wägele, Bernhard Misof

Abstract

Masking of multiple sequence alignment blocks has become a powerful method to enhance the tree-likeness of the underlying data. However, existing masking approaches are insensitive to heterogeneous sequence divergence which can mislead tree reconstructions. We present AliGROOVE, a new method based on a sliding window and a Monte Carlo resampling approach, that visualizes heterogeneous sequence divergence or alignment ambiguity related to single taxa or subsets of taxa within a multiple sequence alignment and tags suspicious branches on a given tree.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 6%
Germany 2 4%
Brazil 2 4%
Sweden 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 38 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 34%
Researcher 7 15%
Professor 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Student > Master 3 6%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 11%
Computer Science 4 9%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 6 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2024.
All research outputs
#5,440,656
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#1,949
of 7,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,316
of 236,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#34
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.