You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genotyping by sequencing for genomic prediction in a soybean breeding population
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-15-740 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Diego Jarquín, Kyle Kocak, Luis Posadas, Katie Hyma, Joseph Jedlicka, George Graef, Aaron Lorenz |
| Abstract |
Advances in genotyping technology, such as genotyping by sequencing (GBS), are making genomic prediction more attractive to reduce breeding cycle times and costs associated with phenotyping. Genomic prediction and selection has been studied in several crop species, but no reports exist in soybean. The objectives of this study were (i) evaluate prospects for genomic selection using GBS in a typical soybean breeding program and (ii) evaluate the effect of GBS marker selection and imputation on genomic prediction accuracy. To achieve these objectives, a set of soybean lines sampled from the University of Nebraska Soybean Breeding Program were genotyped using GBS and evaluated for yield and other agronomic traits at multiple Nebraska locations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 285 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 273 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 69 | 24% |
| Researcher | 56 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 36 | 13% |
| Unknown | 45 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 185 | 65% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 8% |
| Mathematics | 6 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 4% |
| Unknown | 55 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2014.
All research outputs
#13,716,686
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#5,282
of 10,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,502
of 236,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#79
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,638 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.