↓ Skip to main content

ExpressionData - A public resource of high quality curated datasets representing gene expression across anatomy, development and experimental conditions

Overview of attention for article published in BioData Mining, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ExpressionData - A public resource of high quality curated datasets representing gene expression across anatomy, development and experimental conditions
Published in
BioData Mining, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1756-0381-7-18
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philip Zimmermann, Stefan Bleuler, Oliver Laule, Florian Martin, Nikolai V Ivanov, Prisca Campanoni, Karen Oishi, Nicolas Lugon-Moulin, Markus Wyss, Tomas Hruz, Wilhelm Gruissem

Abstract

Reference datasets are often used to compare, interpret or validate experimental data and analytical methods. In the field of gene expression, several reference datasets have been published. Typically, they consist of individual baseline or spike-in experiments carried out in a single laboratory and representing a particular set of conditions. Here, we describe a new type of standardized datasets representative for the spatial and temporal dimensions of gene expression. They result from integrating expression data from a large number of globally normalized and quality controlled public experiments. Expression data is aggregated by anatomical part or stage of development to yield a representative transcriptome for each category. For example, we created a genome-wide expression dataset representing the FDA tissue panel across 35 tissue types. The proposed datasets were created for human and several model organisms and are publicly available at http://www.expressiondata.org.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 32 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 8 24%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 15%
Computer Science 5 15%
Chemistry 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2014.
All research outputs
#3,397,405
of 24,573,729 outputs
Outputs from BioData Mining
#64
of 316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,357
of 242,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioData Mining
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,573,729 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.