↓ Skip to main content

Mobilising communities for Aedes aegypti control: the SEPA approach

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mobilising communities for Aedes aegypti control: the SEPA approach
Published in
BMC Public Health, May 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12889-017-4298-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert J. Ledogar, Jorge Arosteguí, Carlos Hernández-Alvarez, Arcadio Morales-Perez, Elizabeth Nava-Aguilera, José Legorreta-Soberanis, Harold Suazo-Laguna, Alejandro Belli, Jorge Laucirica, Josefina Coloma, Eva Harris, Neil Andersson

Abstract

Camino Verde (the Green Way) is an evidence-based community mobilisation tool for prevention of dengue and other mosquito-borne viral diseases. Its effectiveness was demonstrated in a cluster-randomised controlled trial conducted in 2010-2013 in Nicaragua and Mexico. The common approach that brought functional consistency to the Camino Verde intervention in both Mexico and Nicaragua is Socialisation of Evidence for Participatory Action (SEPA). In this article, we explain the SEPA concept and its theoretical origins, giving examples of its previous application in different countries and contexts. We describe how the approach was used in the Camino Verde intervention, with details that show commonalities and differences in the application of the approach in Mexico and Nicaragua. We discuss issues of cost, replicability and sustainability, and comment on which components of the intervention were most important to its success. In complex interventions, multiple components act in synergy to produce change. Among key factors in the success of Camino Verde were the use of community volunteers called brigadistas, the house-to-house visits they conducted, the use of evidence derived from the communities themselves, and community ownership of the undertaking. Communities received the intervention by random assignment; dengue was not necessarily their greatest concern. The very nature of the dengue threat dictated many of the actions that needed to be taken at household and neighbourhood levels to control it. But within these parameters, communities exercised a large degree of control over the intervention and displayed considerable ingenuity in the process. ISRCTN27581154 .

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 119 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 12%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Other 8 7%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 42 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Environmental Science 5 4%
Other 27 23%
Unknown 47 39%