You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Eligibility screening in evidence synthesis of environmental management topics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13750-017-0102-2 |
| Authors |
Geoff K. Frampton, Barbara Livoreil, Gillian Petrokofsky |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| South Africa | 1 | 10% |
| Brazil | 1 | 10% |
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 98 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 31 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 14 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 21% |
| Unknown | 32 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2021.
All research outputs
#4,334,332
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#161
of 333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,512
of 329,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.