You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nudging children towards whole wheat bread: a field experiment on the influence of fun bread roll shape on breakfast consumption
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-906 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ellen van Kleef, Milou Vrijhof, Ilse A Polet, Monique H Vingerhoeds, René A de Wijk |
| Abstract |
Many children do not eat enough whole grains, which may have negative health consequences. Intervention research is increasingly focusing on nudging as a way to influence food choices by affecting unconscious behavioural processes. The aim of this field study was to examine whether the shape of bread rolls is able to shift children's bread choices from white to whole wheat during breakfast to increase whole grain intake. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 29% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 47% |
| Scientists | 6 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 126 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 15% |
| Researcher | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Unknown | 33 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 10 | 8% |
| Psychology | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 21% |
| Unknown | 37 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,142,511
of 24,415,997 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,259
of 16,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,828
of 242,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#25
of 281 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,415,997 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 281 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.