You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
HIV is an independent predictor of aortic stiffness
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12968-014-0057-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Oliver J Rider, Mina Asaad, Ntobeko Ntusi, Emma Wainwright, Genevieve Clutton, Gemma Hancock, Rajarshi Banerjee, Alex Pitcher, Katherine Samaras, Kieran Clarke, Stefan Neubauer, Lucy Dorrell, Cameron J Holloway |
Abstract |
Patients with treated Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 (HIV) infection are at increased risk of cardiovascular events. Traditionally much of this risk has been attributed to metabolic and anthropometric abnormalities associated with HIV, which are similar to the metabolic syndrome (MS), an established risk factor for cardiovascular mortality. It remains unclear whether treated HIV infection is itself associated with increased risk, via increase vascular stiffness. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 38% |
Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
South Africa | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 77 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 15% |
Researcher | 9 | 11% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
Other | 20 | 25% |
Unknown | 10 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 47% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 10% |
Unknown | 18 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2014.
All research outputs
#8,098,676
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#641
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,449
of 231,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#14
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.