↓ Skip to main content

Biotinidase deficiency: clinical and genetic studies of 38 Brazilian patients

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Genomics, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biotinidase deficiency: clinical and genetic studies of 38 Brazilian patients
Published in
BMC Medical Genomics, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12881-014-0096-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Taciane Borsatto, Fernanda Sperb-Ludwig, Louise LC Pinto, Gisele R De Luca, Francisca L Carvalho, Carolina FM De Souza, Paula FV De Medeiros, Charles M Lourenço, Reinaldo LO Filho, Eurico C Neto, Pricila Bernardi, Sandra Leistner-Segal, Ida VD Schwartz

Abstract

BackgroundBiotinidase deficiency (BD) is an inborn error of metabolism in which some genetic variants correlate with the level of enzyme activity. Biotinidase activity, however, may be artifactually low due to enzyme lability, premature birth, and jaundice; this hinders both phenotypic classification and the decision to implement therapy. This study sought to characterize the clinical and genetic profile of a sample of Brazilian patients exhibiting reduced biotinidase activity.MethodsThis observational, multicenter study used a convenience sampling strategy, with sequencing of exons 2, 3, and 4 of the BTD gene.ResultsThe sample comprised 38 individuals with biochemical phenotypes defined a priori on the basis of biotinidase activity in serum/plasma (2 with profound deficiency, 9 with partial deficiency, 15 heterozygous, 1 borderline between partial deficiency and heterozygosity, 2 borderline between heterozygous and normal) or dried blood spot sample (n¿=¿9, all with unspecified deficiency). Most patients were from Southern Brazil (n¿=¿29/38) and were identified by neonatal screening (n¿=¿33/38). Parental consanguinity was reported in two cases. The most commonly found genetic variants were c.1330G¿>¿C (p.D444H), c.755A¿>¿G (p.D252G), and c.[511G¿>¿A;1330G¿>¿C] (p.[A171T;D444H]), with allele frequencies of 50%, 9.4%, and 5.4% respectively. Three novel pathogenic variants were identified (c.119 T¿>¿C or p.L40P, c.479G¿>¿A or p.C160Y, and c.664G¿>¿A or p.D222N). Twenty-nine patients had two pathogenic variants detected (with cis/trans status ascertained in 26/29), six had only one variant, and three had no pathogenic variants detected. Genotyping confirmed the original phenotypic classification based on enzyme activity in 16/26 cases. Three polymorphic variants were identified in control individuals, of which two were nonpathogenic (c.1171C¿>¿T or p.P391S and c.1413 T¿>¿C or p.C471C, with a frequency of 1.5% and 5.5% respectively) and one pathogenic (c.1330G¿>¿C, frequency 4%).ConclusionsOur findings suggest that partial BD is the most common form of BD in Brazil, and expand current knowledge on the allelic heterogeneity of this condition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 21%
Student > Bachelor 9 21%
Other 7 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 8 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 11 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2014.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Genomics
#1,682
of 2,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,765
of 248,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Genomics
#17
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,444 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.