↓ Skip to main content

A combination of ascorbic acid and α-tocopherol to test the effectiveness and safety in the fragile X syndrome: study protocol for a phase II, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A combination of ascorbic acid and α-tocopherol to test the effectiveness and safety in the fragile X syndrome: study protocol for a phase II, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
Published in
Trials, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-345
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yolanda de Diego-Otero, Rocio Calvo-Medina, Carolina Quintero-Navarro, Lourdes Sánchez-Salido, Francisco García-Guirado, Ignacio del Arco-Herrera, Isabel Fernández-Carvajal, Teresa Ferrando-Lucas, Rafaela Caballero-Andaluz, Lucia Pérez-Costillas

Abstract

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is an inherited neurodevelopmental condition characterised by behavioural, learning disabilities, physical and neurological symptoms. In addition, an important degree of comorbidity with autism is also present. Considered a rare disorder affecting both genders, it first becomes apparent during childhood with displays of language delay and behavioural symptoms.Main aim: To show whether the combination of 10 mg/kg/day of ascorbic acid (vitamin C) and 10 mg/kg/day of α-tocopherol (vitamin E) reduces FXS symptoms among male patients ages 6 to 18 years compared to placebo treatment, as measured on the standardized rating scales at baseline, and after 12 and 24 weeks of treatment.Secondary aims: To assess the safety of the treatment. To describe behavioural and cognitive changes revealed by the Developmental Behaviour Checklist Short Form (DBC-P24) and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. To describe metabolic changes revealed by blood analysis. To measure treatment impact at home and in an academic environment.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Unknown 166 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 15%
Researcher 23 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 43 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 23%
Psychology 23 14%
Neuroscience 15 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 7%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 52 31%