You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluation of universal coverage of insecticide-treated nets in western Kenya: field surveys
|
---|---|
Published in |
Malaria Journal, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-13-351 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Guofa Zhou, Jessica S Li, Ednah N Ototo, Harrysone E Atieli, Andrew K Githeko, Guiyun Yan |
Abstract |
Mass distribution of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) is a cost-effective way to achieve universal coverage, but maintaining this coverage is more difficult. In addition to commonly used indicators, evaluation of universal coverage should include coverage of effective nets and changes in coverage over time. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Malawi | 1 | <1% |
Kenya | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 136 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 38 | 27% |
Researcher | 22 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
Lecturer | 10 | 7% |
Other | 21 | 15% |
Unknown | 25 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 22% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 20 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 10% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 3% |
Other | 22 | 15% |
Unknown | 31 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2014.
All research outputs
#16,584,918
of 24,400,706 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#4,704
of 5,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,273
of 242,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#78
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,400,706 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.